Best DSLR Cameras under $1000

Dick De Jong, Updated July 17, 2012

Nikon D5100 Review

Nikon is very good at positioning its DSLR camera lineup to give consumers a clear progressive choice of features, performance and build as the models become more expensive.

When the Nikon D5100 was released last year, it fit neatly between the entry level D3100 and the enthusiast D7000. The D5100 was a definite step up in image quality from the D3100. Nikon D5100 2CG Best Mid-Range DSLR

And though it shares its 16MP APS-C sensor, along with that image quality with the D7000, the more expensive D7000's build is much sturdier.

The release of the 24MP D3200 this year seems to upset the apple cart, but the image quality and video capabilities of the D5100 still let it maintain its standing above the D3200.

As you can see from the lists below, the D5100 is not a perfect camera, but its quirks and shortcomings are more than compensated by its superior image quality, even at high ISOs.

What's Hot about the Nikon D5100

  • 16MP CMOS APS-C sensor
  • Excellent image quality and dynamic range
  • Good quality at ISO's of 3200 and above
  • Articulating screen
  • Wide selection of lenses
  • HDR shooting mode
  • Ample hand grip and good overall balance
  • 1080p video at multiple frame rates
  • Input for external microphone
  • Continuous AF in Movie mode
  • Special effects shooting modes

What's Not So Caliente about the Nikon D5100

  • Relatively slow under 5fps continuous full resolution shooting
  • No integrated image stabilization, (on the lens only)
  • No Panorama or 3D shooting modes
  • No Built-in GPS
  • Odd placement of some controls
  • Continuous Autofocus in Movie mode is noisy and jumpy
  • No built-in autofocus motor

Design

When you first pick the Nikon D5100 up, you are comforted by its solid grip that allows three fingers to wrap around it. And the large (3" and 921,000 dot) fully articulating screen is a pleasure to view and use.

Nikon D5100 2CG Best Mid-Range DSLR

What's missing for the photographer who likes to change settings on the fly are dedicated buttons for common operations. For example, there are no ISO, White Balance, and Bracketing buttons.

Often you will find them populating the rear multi-selector wheel, but on the D5100, they are MIA. The designer's solution was to include a programmable Function button.

The problem is twofold. First, you can only program one operation onto the button. And then, they placed that button in a hard to reach spot on the front next to the lens.

To their credit almost all of the important controls can be accessed by pushing the Info button and navigating an easy to read menu.

The other interface oddity is the separation of the Live View and Movie functions, which are often integrated on one button. On the D5100, to switch to Live View, you pull a little lever around the Mode dial at the top. Then to start recording a Movie, you hit red Movie button that is offset from the shutter release. The whole process is unnecessarily cumbersome.

A couple of other design issues that are common to most Nikons, the D5100 does not have image stabilization built in to the body. VR (Vibration Reduction), as Nikon labels it, is only featured in some, not all, of their lenses.

For Nikon D5100 memory cards, see Camera Accessories

One of the advantages of buying a Nikon or Canon over a Sony, is that Nikon, (as does Canon), has an extensive series of high quality legacy lenses. Sony more than covers the most common lenses. It just cannot match the wide variety offered by Canon or Nikon.

Relevant to that point, the D5100 does not have an integrated autofocus motor and therefore you can attach a Nikon non-AF-S lens, but you will have to focus it manually, just like the old-timers.

Image Quality

PhotoScope

PhotoScope: Compare Nikon D5100 vs. Nikon D3200

Simply, the quality of the D5100's still photos is excellent, both JPEGs and RAW files. As always, if you are pushing for the highest control and range, capture and process RAW files.

In this PhotoScope link, you can compare the D5100 with the D3200. Be sure to cycle through some of the higher ISO settings to see which displays the most noise.

For those who like to shoot in low light situations, the D5100 noise is manageable even at what used to be considered stratospheric ISO's, like 6400.

Don't expect miracles, but if you are posting low resolution images on your website or printing sizes under 8 x 10, that high ISO performance is downright impressive. Nikon D5100 Best Mid-range DSLR

The image on the right, (from the Gaultier exhibit at the De Young Museum), was originally captured by the D5100 as a RAW file at an ISO of 1600. It was processed in Camera Raw with a low amount of Noise Reduction. (Click it to see a higher resolution rendering.)

The Full HD video quality is also quite good, though the results can be tarnished by a finicky and noisy autofocus. It has a tendency to search too long, which is accentuated by the noise of the servo motor.

One suggestion is to deactivate the autofocus feature and go old school. First, minimize the need to refocus a shot and when it's required pull focus manually.

Features

To start with the positives, the D5100 does offer a whole host of Scene modes like Sports, Close-up, Party/Indoors, and my personal favorite, Pet Portrait (cute kitty). They could be helpful to the beginner, who does not want to worry about making Shutter, ISO and Aperture settings.

Definitely, the more fun and creative options are the Special Effects like Night Vision, Color Sketch, and High Key. Nikon D5100 2CG Best Mid-Range DSLR

If you have seen the D5100 commercial on TV, the Color Selection tool really works, even when shooting videos.

I do miss the lack of Panorama and 3D shooting modes. The camera does include an HDR mode that captures two images with an adjustable exposure differential range of up to 3 EV.

As for GPS, the D5100 is GPS capable, but the feature is not built in. You can buy a separate GPS adapter that will plug into the camera and feed longitude and latitude readings to the image's EXIF file.

Verdict

The Nikon D5100 won accolades when it first came out in 2011 and its capabilities should keep a DSLR fan happy for at least a few more years.

Especially at its current price point, the D5100 is an attractive value. Whenever the D5200 hits the market, the D5100 could become a bargain hunter's delight.

Nikon D5100 Photo Gallery


More about the Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100 spec sheet

PhotoScope

Compare the Nikon 5100 to the Competition

Reader Comments(8 comments)

Posted Oct 10, 2013 8:31:16 PM
By Big Mike
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I wasn't aware that the Sony was unable to autofocus in manual mode. The superior video autofocusing was the only reason why I was considering the a65, but what's the point if I have no control over depth of field? It's also my understanding that you can't control the aperture while in live view on the Nikons. Both shortcomings are reasons enough for me to go with the Canon T4i; the autofocusing (in live view and video) could be better, but you have full manual control.
Posted Nov 2, 2012 8:54:18 PM
By Kuro
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Hey how 'bout the Pentax K-30 which is as good or better than the T4i but $100 less.
Posted Oct 31, 2012 11:52:07 AM
By Peteralex
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I was planning to buy the a65. Read everything about it. Fine. Went to the store and my, not too tall, not to wide, very healthy born fingers were automatically cramped into position at the grip. Not so good. It felt very uncomfortable. The body is a normal size, only the grip is truly disappointing. Especially the rubber thingy that places itself between the fingers at the front makes that you can't move your fingers elsewhere.. so totally forced bent fingertips were the result of trying to just hold the camera and make a picture, or just grab it. Or for example, to get it out of a bag. Too bad sony. This I noticed ofcourse also with the a57 (which had a horrible viewfinder). I now have the a390 and the a580. Those grips vary just a little but have more grab comfort and room. The a77 is bigger, lets put my hope on that one (havent tried it yet).
Posted Sep 2, 2012 7:49:54 PM
By krazi311
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
ok so im really confused on which to buy now... The a65 or Rebel t4i?? Reading these reviews have made it even more difficult due to the great research put into them. I'm new to photography and this will be my first dslr. Having the touchscreen is cool but not vital. If they both had it then this might be a little easier. I wouldnt be shooting videos, mostly still shots. Action shots? do you really need the 10 fps or is 5 good enough? Can some one please help me?! I dont mind spending the money on the a65 but in the long run whats better for me.
Posted Aug 28, 2012 3:30:02 PM
By Dick De Jong
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Art,

Suggesting lenses for others is always a tough call for reasons too long to list.

If you are interested in high quality and are ready to make the commitment, then Zeiss lenses are great choices, but they come at a premium price tag.

For example, the Sony 85mm F1.4 ZA Carl Zeiss Planar T* is a wonderful portrait prime lens. Of course, at $1600, it's almost twice the price of the a65 body alone. But good lenses can last through multiple generations of cameras.
Posted Aug 28, 2012 2:55:55 PM
By Dick De Jong
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Frazzywig,

I've been shooting video for decades and I'm still not convinced that any of these DSLRs are the perfect solution for capturing video. (I listed many of those reasons in my article, Making Home Movies: http://www.2cameraguys.com/Making-Home-Movies-with-Digital-Cameras.htm)

With that said, I do not discount your preference of the T4i over the a65 when shooting video. I will say that if you plan to use autofocus with any of these cameras, then expect to capture segments of out of focus searching, which you will need to edit.

And if you want higher quality audio, then you will need to use an external microphone and ideally a good audio recorder.

I'll admit that I am still rating these cameras more for their still image abilities and less on their video. Accordingly, the Sony a65 is on the top of my list. But as I've said, the T4i is a very good camera, which you should enjoy.
Posted Aug 14, 2012 12:06:07 PM
By frazzywig
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I've been planning on getting the t4i for a while now, but after reading this review and then taking a couple more looks at the a65, I have to admit I was blown away by the Sony offering. I wanted to do a little more research but was almost certain that I'd be going for the a65 rather than that t4i. I'm glad I ended up taking the extra time to search out bad aspects of the a65 because I found some fairly important omissions to this review. I should note that I'm primarily interested in using the camera for video. Most of the omitted drawbacks that I'm referring to pertain to video: There is an additional sensor crop beyond the native APS-C (1.6x) size when shooting video, making the crop somewhere around 1.85x (that's no small amount when you want to be able to get your money's worth from wide glass), the a65 is unable to shoot video beyond 1600 ISO, it's also unable to shoot with full time auto focus in manual mode (so you can't specify an aperture while using AF in video), audio has no level control at all - the gain is controlled automatically. None the less, I appreciate your efforts in putting up a good review. I have not put in the work and I appreciate that you have. I’d just like to let you know that I think these issues really should have knocked the a65 down to 2nd place, below the t4i. Just my opinion.
Posted Aug 9, 2012 6:53:25 PM
By Art
Post a Comment Alert Moderator
You mention the suggestion of buying only the body and buying a separate Sony Prime lens. Any specific suggestions (with links)?